Thursday, September 1, 2011

sad love quotes english

images Love Poems, Love Messages, sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. love
  • sad love quotes english. love



  • nyte_crawler
    09-15 08:23 AM
    What kind of job is that that pays $$$ an hour? LOBBYING ? :)





    wallpaper sad love quotes english. love sad love quotes english. sad quotes Cute Quotes
  • sad quotes Cute Quotes



  • bujjigadu123
    02-22 03:49 PM
    if your case is straight forward...... you have nothing to worry about........

    Hi
    Could you please tell me what I should be ready with to confirm my case is straight forward.

    I am ready with LCA, H1 visa stamped passort ( for me and for my family), Pay stubs, client appreciation letters, h1 approval notice, past experience letters, offer letter.
    Please let me know what else I should be ready with?





    sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. sad
  • sad love quotes english. sad



  • aachoo
    02-20 07:00 PM
    Employment letter with salary, did your status change?

    nope. I am still waiting for the RFE.





    2011 sad quotes Cute Quotes sad love quotes english. dresses love quotes for him in
  • dresses love quotes for him in



  • gc28262
    06-10 05:21 PM
    We shouldn't give much significance to what USCIS and DOS officials say. Both of these departments don't have a grasp on what is happening in their respective organizations.

    They are just government officials doing some PR activity for the sake of it.

    I also don't give any significance to the description that DOS provides in visa bulletins ( Due to extreme demand, visa category X is oversubscribed.. blah blah blah ...):mad:



    more...


    sad love quotes english. emo love quotes.
  • emo love quotes.



  • naushit
    08-07 01:04 PM
    My PD is August 2003
    RD = 17th Jun 2007
    ND = 18th Jul 2007





    sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. sad
  • sad love quotes english. sad



  • prabasiodia
    08-09 05:24 PM
    I think these memos might have been dissected a thousand times, but here they are:

    Continuing validity of I-140: http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I140_AC21_8403.pdf
    AC21 guidelines: http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/AC21intrm051205.pdf

    It's clear that the stress is on "intent". If at the filing of I-485, both the employer and the employee had the intent, it's fine. The only restriction is, one may not be looking for "same or similar" job at the time of I-485 adjudication. Why this restriction is even there is beyond me. It doesn't clearly state how much time after the adjudication, you should not be looking.

    Of course, the lawyers seem to be on the cautious side. Read the last sentence under intent in the following site (AC21: Changing employer while waiting for pending adjustment of status (http://www..com/greencard/adjustmentofstatus/changing-employer.html) ). It says that ...theoretically, USCIS might be able to revisit the adjudication of I-485 and initiate revocation processing.
    This inference is without any attribution.

    Then again, I couldn't find a single case where the I-485 was revoked because of suspected fraud in "Intent". We do need clarification from USCIS on this.



    more...


    sad love quotes english. sad love quotes in english.
  • sad love quotes in english.



  • marwan234
    10-03 10:12 PM
    Why CSC WHYYYYY??? :(
    You gave me EAD, you gave me AP, you gave me receipts......why did you put me back at the mercy of NSC again? WHYYY? you knew they suck!!!
    No FP yet for me or my wife. Been calling CIS.....feels like talking to a wall.
    I guess we CSC transferees are DOOMED!!!
    There shall be light at the end of the tunnel....or it could just be an incoming train :-)





    2010 sad love quotes english. sad sad love quotes english. Love Poems, Love Messages,
  • Love Poems, Love Messages,



  • sledge_hammer
    02-27 04:10 PM
    Though I want to feel sorry for you I cannot. Between all the things you have written I was trying to find one small indication to know that you are sorry for what you have done. I did not find one. You are arrogant enough to blame the immigration laws for not permiting you to come to the US, but never really looked into your own flaws for flouting drug laws.

    Besides, this is a forum for legal employment based immigrants. You may hardly find any resource here that will help you with what you want!

    My husband and son are being discriminated against for having an Alien wife and mother.

    If an Alien deported with drug-related offences of more than 30 grams of Marijuana, like me, solicits a Non-Immigrant Visa to visit in the U.S. at the same time my husband or son solicit an Immigrant Visa for me to remain in the U.S. with them, the Alien will be granted her Non-Immigrant Visa and my husband’s or my son’s request will never be acknowledged.

    This is our story: Everything we ever learned from the U.S. about truth and justice is suddenly being deprived of any meaning by the U.S. itself. The hardest part for us is believing that everything we’ve based our lives on – the American way, has no merit.

    I was deported from the United States of America on February 18, 2005. I lived there nearly 30 years since I was 20 months old, when my mother crossed the Rio Grande into the country with me illegally. I was given an opportunity to become legal under the NACARA law but was to afraid of being deported like Maricela Soza was under the same law and didn’t go through with the entire process. I have both a husband and a son who are U.S. citizens but I am permanently prohibited by Immigration law from immigrating to the United States, while at the same time I am allowed to visit. Due to my drug-related offence of more than 30 grams of Marijuana. It’s Immigration law’s contradicting policies which I find disturbing.

    U.S. Immigration is concerned with their citizens’ welfare but it is denying my husband’s and my son’s requests to have me back by their side for good. Although Immigration law will value my wish to receive admission into the United States. Needless to say I prefer returning, immigrating and remaining in the country by my family’s side. That’s not taking into account the fact that I am still homesick and continue experiencing culture shock in Nicaragua. What the Department of Homeland Security is doing to my family and I is cruel, inhumane and unpatriotic. No free country’s government has any business deciding how families should be formed or whose personal choice is agreeable or not. Like that of my son’s and husband’s choice to overlook my shortcomings and begin our lives over together again.

    The 212(d)(3) Waiver allows a visitor’s visa into the U.S. to be issued to an Alien like me if I show evidence of rehabilitation such as becoming a practicing professional with a U.S. job offer. Sometimes with lone proof of a bank savings account, school registration and satisfactory travel record. On the other hand there isn’t one waiver available for United States Citizens who wish to rebuild their lives with an Alien deported for any drug-related offence of more than 30 grams of Marijuana. Not only are my son’s and my husband’s needs being ignored but my needs are being placed before their own. An act I dare name TREASON.

    How much more is the United States citizens’ welfare secured if an Alien with an undesirable drug history enters the United States merely to visit and not to immigrate? Shouldn’t all United States citizens’ needs and rights within and from their country – such as my husband’s and my son’s, come before any Alien’s need or right to receive admission into the U.S., including my own? Also, shouldn’t Family-Based Immigration take first place over “Alien travel” for any reason?

    I regret to say it’s these types of injustices with devastating consequences to the recipient’s and his/her immediate relatives’ personal lives remaining raveled, much more unacknowledged that play a large role in the cause for conflict concerning disloyalty toward the U.S. and unpopularity of the U.S. among U.S. citizens and foreign nationals inside and outside of the United States. I trust that once this oversight is brought to DHS’s attention they will not knowingly continue punishing my husband and my son for loving me, an Alien who once stumbled while attempting to survive in the U.S..

    I’m afraid to imagine how many individuals involved in cases like my family’s and mine go on thinking that the U.S. is a bad country for having the audacity to pass judgment on them. I’ve had to believe there’s a glitch somewhere in immigration law caused by simple human error. I can’t accept that the U.S. I grew to know as a loving, Christian country with caring values is intentionally causing my loved ones and I grief. It goes without saying that as much as the United States has a duty to protect its citizens it also has a duty to be equally diplomatic toward foreigners and not continue persecuting the one or the other long after any condemning sentence has been exacted and executed. I know the United States of America will do right by my son, my husband, me, and the rest of its citizens and foreign nationals in our predicament.

    We want the 212(d)(3) Non-Immigrant Visas Waiver made into an Immigrant Visas Waiver for Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizens to make sure United States citizens receive competent protection from the Department of Homeland Security and adequate protection from the United States of America.

    My husband and son believe a Waiver should be available to me and I believe their Freedom Of Belief civil liberty is being violated because their belief is being discriminated against. My needs are being placed before their own. I am not able to immigrate to the U.S. because immigration law doesn’t allow me a Waiver enabling my husband or son to claim me successfully. If I had a Waiver available to me they wouldn’t have to be at this crossroads making their case public in the courts, therefore their Right To Privacy is also being violated as a result of their belief being discriminated against. I couldn’t live with myself if I don’t speak out, they’re attempting to do the same for me. We don’t want to cause any problems, we just want to move on with our lives.



    more...


    sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. sad
  • sad love quotes english. sad



  • reddysn
    05-29 06:15 PM
    ramus you got good sense of humor man ....I could not stop laughing ..

    After reading this I am not sure if I can ask you send web-fax..
    Thanks.





    hair dresses love quotes for him in sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english
  • sad love quotes english



  • sats123
    06-19 04:25 PM
    Carlau, Thanks for helping me. I also got your PM. This is a great find. I am trying to look in this URL based on my job title.

    sats123, I could help you on that (to guess the job description they used to file) - just try to find your position in here: http://www.flcdatacenter.com/OesWizardStart.aspx



    more...


    sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english
  • sad love quotes english



  • eastindia
    04-22 09:36 AM
    H1Bslave you have no idea what you are talking about. Find me a single Senator who is opposed to illegals and favors legals. By Legals I mean H1Bs like you and me. Ask that Senator if he supports H1Bs completely.

    Or find me a bill that opposes illegals and fully supports legals ie; H1Bs like you and me.

    This is a challenge for you.

    I hope your slave mentality has enough wisdom to answer rather than asking your master who has exploited you so much that you have lost your rational thinking.





    hot emo love quotes. sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english.
  • sad love quotes english.



  • dc2007
    08-23 01:29 PM
    Hi All,

    I don't know if you all know about the ranking of a person or not. There is a sign of "weight balance" at the top right of each post adjacent to the green/red arrow. You can click and disapprove the comment.

    If you don't like plassy's or anybody's else comments, please do that so that others people in this forum should know about that.

    Thanks



    more...


    house sad love quotes english. sad sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english
  • sad love quotes english



  • lskreddy
    06-13 12:26 PM
    Every one has his own vantage point. Mark K has his own and the others who represented for legal immigration has their own. Mark K's argument to only allow the so called 'Einstein caliber" people speaks volumes about how he has simplified the problem.

    Sitting on a high position in an immigration research facility does not necessarily mean that he is abreast with the technological needs. From his arguments, he certainly has proven that he has very little or no idea of where the resource needs are.

    Everyone of us are here because there is room for us to work. If his research shows that there are more US people who will fill our shoes, then I am sure the market needs would govern the numbers. For all the anti's who cite articles about how low paid we are, how less qualified we are, they should research to complete the full circle. They leave it half-hearted, its not as if they don't know, they just want to stick on to the rhetoric.

    Even to entertain Mark K's idea about bringing the so called cream of the crop, there has to be proven ways to identify who these people are. One way of doing it is to allow people to come here on F1, prove their worth in research, work for a few years. One does not become an EB1 qualified before he steps into the country, he probably climbs his way up to that qualification. Some may succeed, some may fail. To selectively choose the best and expel the rest would mean disaster for the country. These are human lives we are talking about, not parts in a process control factory where you can chuck as and when you need as it does not meet 'specifications'.

    He has blinders on, and that will never change. You can't debate a person who has already decided on what the outcome. The most amusing part personally for me is that most of the anti-legal folks accuse the entire industry of conspiring to screw their own. I can see how one or two companies to do that, but to underline that the entire system is geared towards raping their own is blasphemous to say the least.





    tattoo sad love quotes english. sad sad love quotes english. house sad love quotes english
  • house sad love quotes english



  • vik352
    11-21 01:52 PM
    Let's start the call campaign. I want to be the baby that cries (or rather calls) a lot :-)



    more...


    pictures sad love quotes in english. sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. sad
  • sad love quotes english. sad



  • aamirzeeshan
    01-11 02:40 PM
    I understand your situation as i was there once. If you dont have insurance than your options are very limited. if you live in dallas county parkland hospital is your only choice. Parkland has a network of several clinics around DFW area. Every clinic has financial assistance department. You can visit any of those and they will setup a payment plan which is reasonable based on your income. You will visit them for all prenatal care and when the time comes for delivery it will be taken to parkland. and parkland is a very good hospital as well. beside parkland several hospitals also offer cash plans like RHD memorial at 635 but they will charge you close to 4k just for delivery day and if its a normal one. you will have to do prenatal at your own.





    dresses sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. pictures sad love quotes
  • pictures sad love quotes



  • americandesi
    01-04 03:03 PM
    Let me acknowledge..This thread made me easily come out of holiday blues. Above thats its friday...!!!!

    My take on this situation....ask your freind to apply for concurent H1b's..it works out well with concurent wives...!!!!:):):) He can bring one wife on each visa..!!!!

    Yeah right! Do you really think that these women would qualify for skilled labor under H1?

    Anyway, they could try getting their LCA with following information and apply for H1.

    Client � Husband

    List of duties - Nagging, sobbing, yelling, demanding, gossiping, fighting, scolding, complaining, irritating, urging, nerve-racking, tormenting, annoying, upsetting

    Work location � His peace of mind

    Work duration � Equivalent to his lifespan

    Prevailing wage - Equivalent to his entire earnings

    Finally a kind hearted IO might think that they are really something and approve the petition ;).



    more...


    makeup sad love quotes english. sad sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english. sad
  • sad love quotes english. sad



  • qtoask
    07-06 03:43 PM
    Members: can you request IV to endorse this ... more than 100 people are waiting to get hear 'YES' from core...


    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6025


    thank you





    girlfriend house sad love quotes english sad love quotes english. sad love quotes english.
  • sad love quotes english.



  • sujan_vatrapu
    11-03 08:39 AM
    As was said somewhere else on this forum, "lets take care of the foreigners first and then take care of the dying!" Sounds - what's the word - logical!

    lets stop this rhetoric on repubs, what about bobby jindal, marco rubio & nick haley and plz don't give explanations to distort the reality, many in the republicans sincerely support legal immigration, tell me few good things dems did to legal immigrants, aint regan the one who gave amnesty to illegals in 80s, aint bush the one who tried more than once to pass CIR, who opposed h1b fee increase recently?





    hairstyles sad love quotes english sad love quotes english. sad love quotes in english.
  • sad love quotes in english.



  • paskal
    12-20 11:41 PM
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/20/AR2006122001910.html


    both Rajiv Khanna and Shusterman have fought these kinds of high profile cases
    wonder if they might be interested in something like this.......





    god_bless_you
    02-20 06:21 PM
    Office of Communications
    www.uscis.gov
    Questions & Answers February 20, 2008
    FBI Name Check
    Q1. How has USCIS changed its national security reporting and adjudication
    requirements?
    A1. USCIS has not changed its background check policies as those policies related to naturalization
    applications. Recently, the agency did modify its existing guidance for applications where the
    immigration laws allow for the detention and removal of individuals if actionable information from a FBI
    name check response is received after approval. For these types of applications, including applications
    for lawful permanent residence, the adjudicators will approve the application if it is otherwise approvable
    and the FBI name check request has been pending for more than 180 days. No application for lawful
    permanent residence will be approved until a definitive FBI fingerprint check and Interagency Border
    Inspection Services (IBIS) check are completed and resolved favorably.
    Q2. Why is this policy being implemented?
    A2. This policy change is in response to a 2005 DHS Inspector General recommendation that USCIS
    align its background check screening policies with those of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
    Q3. Is this policy consistent with the national security priorities of USCIS and the Department of
    Homeland Security?
    A3. Yes. No application for lawful permanent residence will be approved until a definitive FBI
    fingerprint check and Interagency Border Inspection Services (IBIS) check are completed and resolved
    favorably. In addition, in the unlikely event that DHS receives actionable information after the
    application is approved, it will initiate removal proceedings. Lastly, in general these individuals have
    been in the United States for some time and have previously been subjected to DHS background checks.
    Q4. What applications are affected by this policy change?
    A4. Applications included in this policy are:
    �� I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status;
    �� I-601, Application for Waiver of Ground of Inadmissibility;
    �� I-687, Application for Status as a Temporary Resident Under Section 245A of the Immigration
    and Nationality Act; and
    �� I-698, Application to Adjust Status from Temporary to Permanent Resident (Under Section 245A
    of Public Law 99-603).
    Q5. How many applications for lawful permanent residence are affected by this policy change?
    A3. USCIS is currently aware of approximately 47,000 applications for permanent residence (I-485) cases
    that are otherwise approvable but for the fact that an FBI name check is pending. In a subset of these
    case, the FBI name check request that been pending for more than 180 days. USCIS anticipates that the
    majority of the cases that are subject to this policy modification will be processed by mid-March 2008.
    Q5. Does this policy change affect naturalization applications?
    A5. No. There is no change in the requirement that FBI name check, FBI fingerprint and IBIS check
    results be obtained and resolved prior to the adjudication of an Application for Naturalization (N-400),
    Q6. How long will it take for USCIS to work through these cases affected by the policy change?
    A6. USCIS has begun identifying the cases affected by this policy modification in each field office and
    service center. Each office will evaluate the pending cases and will adjust their workload accordingly.
    USCIS anticipates that the majority of the cases that are subject to this policy modification will be
    processed by mid-March 2008. We recommend that customers wait until mid-March before inquiring
    about their cases. This will allow each office sufficient time to identify and adjudicate pending cases.
    Q7. USCIS Director Gonzalez pledged in his January 17, 2008, testimony regarding naturalization
    backlogs before Congress not to cut corners in the adjudicative process or risk national security in
    the interest of production? Does this policy comply with the Director’s pledge?
    A7. Yes. There is no change in the requirement that FBI name check, FBI fingerprint and IBIS check
    results be obtained and resolved prior to the adjudication of an Application for Naturalization (N-400),
    For those applications for permanent residence that are affected by this policy modification, no
    application will be approved until a definitive FBI fingerprint check and Interagency Border Inspection
    Services (IBIS) check are completed and resolved favorably. USCIS will continue to initiate the FBI
    name check requests upon receipt of the applications and will review, monitor and track cases approved
    under this policy until the FBI name check is complete. In the unlikely event that DHS receives
    actionable information after the application is approved, it will initiate removal proceedings.
    Q8. The memorandum identifies I-485, I-601, I-687 and I-698 forms. Is there a plan to include
    other forms, specifically nonimmigrant and naturalization, in this policy?
    A8. No.
    Q9. Should customers contact USCIS through the 1-800 customer service number or make an
    INFOPASS appointment to visit their local office if they believe their application meets the criteria
    of this new policy?
    A9. We recommend that customers wait until mid-March before inquiring about cases affected by this
    policy modification. This will allow each office sufficient time to identify and adjudicate the relevant
    pending cases. If no action is taken by mid-March, we recommend inquiring with the USCIS customer
    service line at 1-800-375-5283.
    Q10. Will USCIS automatically notify an applicant to appear at an Application Support Center if their fingerprints have expired?
    A10. Applicants will be notified through an appointment notice if new/updated fingerprint checks are
    needed.
    – USCIS –





    HumHongeKamiyab
    11-09 04:30 PM
    Filed on 12th july to TSC. Received I 485 receipt, EAD and AP for both me and my wife but no FP notice. My PD is Aug 2003 - EB3 India



    No comments:

    Post a Comment